Editorial- "The Long, Low Road"

Youve heard all about it by now: more than than 90 million viewers watching the Super curl got a flash of Janet capital of Mississippis b atomic number 18 titty after one-half of her leather bustier was ripped a elbow room by her partner Justin Timberlake in the consummation of their performance.

Officials at CBS issued an apology, claiming the vulnerability caught them by surprise. MTV, which spent millions and months planning the halftime show, claimed the exposure was unrehearsed, unplanned, and completely unintentional. Timberland blamed a wardrobe malfunction. Jackson admitted she cooked up the whole thing, but its unclear who else knew.

The Super whorl halftime show has turned into a spectacle all its own, a way to keep the non-football fans engaged in the nations large(p)gest game. In fact, m whatsoever young viewers tend to skip the game and just telephone line in for the halftime concert.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman, Michael K. Powell, coordinateed an investigation into whether the viewing violated regulations that bar the broadcast of indecent material during hours when children are likely to be watching.

The crotch-grabbing and gyrating on display Sunday were scantily family fare even before Jacksons garment was ripped off. Television has been departure down the low road for a long time. waken sells, apparently, a lot buy.

Is the Jackson incident really that big a deal? Was a bare breast any worse than all those booze and erectile-dysfunction ads the bombarded Super Bowl viewers? Truth is... all of it is tacky.

The chill already has begun to set in. As in all things trendy, what matters is not what the government says but what the hum on the street says. The buzz, which is what is being said by the real kids the show was meant to pull in, recognizes the wardrobe malfunction for what it is: a promotional material stunt...

--

References

-->

Youre right about the motivation behind the stunt. Music stars be intimate that publicity is as important in marketing CDs as is talent. Its more about image than music, and the more controversial the better. The supposition is to cultivate a controversial image in order to get a star noticed so that CD sales hopefully take off. If taking off wear does the trick, then a star has been successful in get free publicity. It doesnt seem to matter that its negative publicity as long as stars stay in the public eye. It doesnt eer work out this way, and its sad when it does.

I come from England where Page 3 of the Sun newspaper is a national institution. Its a breast whoo hoo so what, lets go back to work.


I totally see with you.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.